Dating a theoretical physicist

  1. Encouraged submissions
  2. 15 Reasons Why You Should Date a Physicist | The World: An Idiot's Point of View
  3. References

He knows that a system of 3 bodies is very difficult to solve and that the solution will always lead to chaos. He can prove to you that Big Bang is not just a theory. Many problems in physics involve a lot of optimization, least action, efficiency etc. He is an expert in maximizing both of your time, money, effort and fun. Finally, like any other persons you have met,he is a normal person who also can love and be loved.

Encouraged submissions

I mean, is it true that everyone is equal when it comes to love? Reblogged this on Chemistry, Champagne and Chaos and commented: Like Liked by 1 person. This is really awesome! He will never want you to understand all his science. But when you do it and learn some nerdy stuff, he will cover you with roses. Reblogged this on Photography and Blah!

Awesome post…myself being a physicist I love every post…. You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Posted on November 26, November 26, by vondoomhannibal. But hey, not all people are perfect so here are the 15 reasons why you should date a physicist: To give you a proof of that, we even have a cat that is alive and dead at the same time.

Welcome to Reddit,

I said Bang, Bang, Bangity Bang! What other characteristics of a physicist have we missed? Doing physics is very difficult for most people and the compensation sucks. I recommend that people do a well paying job and read physics for fun.

If I taught high school, this might be what it would be like. You get to teach the simple stuff that is kind of amazing and why I got into this racket in the first place to little kids and blow their minds, and in your spare time there's lots of cool reading and lectures to be absorbed about what else is going on. Your work experiences mirror a lot of my own, when I worked at a restaurant.

I assumed that since I can start working with smart people, I wouldn't have to worry about things like getting yelled at for other people's faults. I spent years in grad school assuming I was getting no preparation for work in the outside world. Then in the past couple years, as my good friends get into their own careers, I've found that a lot of shit is the same everywhere. I have all the office drama that people in offices have, it's just the people I work with are all scientists.

And the people in the real offices get paid more ;. I am very fortunate that I realized this early. The following comment is basically what I've been thinking about for the last 4 years or so. It is directed at OP and those in a situation similar to OP's situation but it was inspired by "I hate physics" so I decided to put it here. For most of high school, I had been aiming towards becoming a physics professor because I love physics.

In my first quarter of freshman year of college, I realized a few things. It wasn't physics I liked, but problem solving, and majoring in physics to become a professor is like playing little league to become an MLB player. Every field has problem solving, you just need to find the type of problem solving that suits you best. In engineering fields, the problems are very realistic so if you like to think in terms of the real world, become an engineer. In physics, the problems are technically real world problems but you need to view the problem in the right context From what I've observed, this tends to come down to the size of what you are working with.

You will think about problems involving black holes in a different way than you will think about a problem involving grains of sand. Applied mathematics is very similar to physics but the areas you will be working in are generally different; in applied mathematics, you could be working in areas outside of physics such as working as an actuary. In theoretical mathematics, you will need to through out any notion of reality in order to think about the problems the right way; then, when you need to explain your solution, you can come back to reality to make it easier to understand for the person you are explaining it to.

In computer science, you will be telling a machine to do something and it will do it; if there is an error, you will need to go back and see how you screwed up because the machine simply followed your orders. Majoring in physics is only one of the early steps of becoming a professional physicist.

After your undergrad, you will have grad school which can vary from some number of years to a significant portion of your life. After getting a graduate degree, you will do one of two things depending on your final goal, either work at a lab that will higher you or start doing post-doc.

15 Reasons Why You Should Date a Physicist | The World: An Idiot's Point of View

If you work for the lab, you won't be paid too much but your job will be fairly stable. If you start doing post-doc, your pay will be shit but it is a step towards becoming a professor. Then you need to wait for a college that is willing to accept you to have an opening you are essentially profiting off of one of two things, either someone's death or the school expanding.

And all of that is assuming you get into grad school.


If you don't, you are stuck with an undergrad in physics. What I would do in that situation is go into teaching high school but I have heard that some employers outside of physics take a degree in physics as a "proof of intelligence. I spent my first quarter of college deciding what major to switch to from physics. My top choices were electrical and computer engineering, robotics engineering, computer science, and mathematics my university is either the first or the only one in the U.

To decide, I attended a course for freshman about exploring majors, for me this wasn't useful but your school may have one and it may be useful to you. I also attended lectures for courses in each major. I ended up deciding on computer science.

  • executive dating toronto!
  • dating agencies sydney.
  • Theoretical Physicists Suggest A More Precise Date For The End Of The Universe?

Like I said before, every field has problem solving and I like problem solving, so I just had to decide what sort of problem solving I liked. I like that if I tell a computer to do something, it will do it and, if it doesn't, it's because I messed up. The other thing I like about computer science, is many companies have very flexible work hours so long as you show up for meetings.

If I'm on a roll one day, I would like to work until 4: The last two reasons are because of money and my school has a good relationship with a wide variety of companies that hire computer scientists. For me it's the opposite problem - to my surprise and dismay, it's the problem solving that I'm really struggling with. I chose physics because I was curious about the most basic functioning of the universe, and reading about other people's discoveries is indeed intriguing, but figuring out stuff myself just isn't as exciting as everyone tells me it should be.

  1. Would you date a non-scientist?.
  2. …when idiots tried to be curious..
  3. Want to add to the discussion??
  4. oliver and laurel dating.
  5. What Graduate School in Theoretical Physics Is Really Like!
  6. .
  7. It's telling that the most exciting front of science for me is the discovery of exoplanets, which is basically geography extended into space. That's why I don't trust my yearning for EE and CS - according to all signs, I'd be equally miserable in those disciplines. I've found that I enjoy contemplating the concepts I learn, but doing the work involved with solving problems turns me off. I like to solve problems if it's mostly inside my mind creative thinking!

    Maybe try very obviously over or under exaggerating the importance of your work? But I agree "Oh! You must be really smart. To those people who says things like that I want to say "To the contrary, I just took in interest in something and put a lot of effort into learning it. You should it try it sometime" But that would be douche thing to do. You won't be happy with one in the long run, anyway. I assure you, we're not all empty headed bubbly morons. Look for the brains attached to the girl, not the simpering idiocy attached to the tits.

    Yes, but finding you smart women out in the wild I. I'm sure its the same if not worse for women in physics trying to find men to date.

    • Possible Use of Ca41 in Nuclear Dating | Progress of Theoretical Physics | Oxford Academic?
    • What Does Any of This Have To Do with Physics?.
    • singles dating san antonio.
    • Nurture your brain:.
    • should i sign up for a dating website.

    Why the fuck you trying to meet women at bars? Make this shit efficient, do Ok Cupid and meet friends of friends at casual get togethers or organizations, etc.